As Time Goes By in Weather Forecasting: Evaluation

This is the rubric by which your performance will be evaluated. Your project score will include assessments of your individual contribution, as well as your group’s performance.

Suggested Rubric

As Time Goes By in Weather Forecasting
Student Name_____________________________________
Date_________________
Group Members: _________________________________________________________________
Beginning
Developing
Accomplished
Exemplary
Points
Overall Group Performance:

How well did your group work together?

(25 points possible)
(10 points)

Not all members of the group contributed.  Discussion in the group was limited or non-existent.  Work reflects only individual thought, not a consensus and synthesis of research.
(15 points)

Most members of the group contributed to its success, though a consensus was hard to reach.  Work reflects more individual thought and low level processing.
(20 points)

Each member of the group contributed to its success.  Answers to questions showed information, but less synthesis and analysis.  Answers were different among individuals and supported individual thought.
(25 points)

Each member of the group contributed to its success.  Worked well together, asked higher level questions, and gave answers that supported group thinking.
Group Report:

Research presented in a clear and accurate form?

(25 points possible)
(10 points)

Information is incorrect and missing.  Organization is loosely connected.  Most sources have no citations.
(15 points)

Organization has some missing connections.  Most sources are cited.
(20 points)

Information is factual, with no more than a minimal amount of calculation errors.  All sources of information are cited.
(25 points)

Information is clearly presented.  All sources of information are cited.
Data sheet:
Graphs:
Individual Report:

Research presented in a clear, accurate and insightful manner.

(50 points possible)
(20 points)

Information has some error.  Poor organization.  More than 5 spelling or grammatical errors.
(30 points)

Minimal amount of higher level interpretations.  Information is factual, but poorly organized.  No more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors.
(40 points)

Interpretation shows some higher level processing.  Information is factual and well organized.  No more than 3 spelling or grammatical errors.
(50 points)

Interpretation shows thought, organization, and provides factual information.  Shows high level processing.  No spelling or grammatical errors.
Data sheet:
Graphs:
TOTAL POINTS:
Teacher comments: