This is the rubric by which your performance will be evaluated. Your project score will include assessments of your individual contribution, as well as your group’s performance.
Suggested Rubric
|
As Time Goes By in Weather Forecasting
|
|||||
|
Student Name_____________________________________
|
Date_________________
|
||||
|
Group Members: _________________________________________________________________
|
|||||
|
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
Points
|
|
|
Overall Group Performance:
How well did your group work together?
(25 points possible)
|
(10 points)
Not all members of the group contributed. Discussion in the group was limited or non-existent. Work reflects only individual thought, not a consensus and synthesis of research.
|
(15 points)
Most members of the group contributed to its success, though a consensus was hard to reach. Work reflects more individual thought and low level processing.
|
(20 points)
Each member of the group contributed to its success. Answers to questions showed information, but less synthesis and analysis. Answers were different among individuals and supported individual thought.
|
(25 points)
Each member of the group contributed to its success. Worked well together, asked higher level questions, and gave answers that supported group thinking.
|
|
|
Group Report:
Research presented in a clear and accurate form?
(25 points possible)
|
(10 points)
Information is incorrect and missing. Organization is loosely connected. Most sources have no citations.
|
(15 points)
Organization has some missing connections. Most sources are cited.
|
(20 points)
Information is factual, with no more than a minimal amount of calculation errors. All sources of information are cited.
|
(25 points)
Information is clearly presented. All sources of information are cited.
|
Data sheet:
Graphs:
|
|
Individual Report:
Research presented in a clear, accurate and insightful manner.
(50 points possible)
|
(20 points)
Information has some error. Poor organization. More than 5 spelling or grammatical errors.
|
(30 points)
Minimal amount of higher level interpretations. Information is factual, but poorly organized. No more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors.
|
(40 points)
Interpretation shows some higher level processing. Information is factual and well organized. No more than 3 spelling or grammatical errors.
|
(50 points)
Interpretation shows thought, organization, and provides factual information. Shows high level processing. No spelling or grammatical errors.
|
Data sheet:
Graphs:
|
|
TOTAL POINTS:
|
|||||
|
Teacher comments:
|
|||||