Healing Men to Reduce Re-Offending: Trauma Resolution Treatment in Prisoner Reentry Programs

Michael Levandoski, “Healing Men to Reduce Re-Offending: Trauma Resolution Treatment in Prisoner Reentry Programs”
Mentor: James Topitzes, Social Work

Alper, Durose, and Markman’s (2018) longitudinal study on rearrest data in 30 states reported that over 80% of prisoners returned to jail within nine years of release. With over 600,000 being released each year, effectively increasing the success of reentry efforts is important for public safety and cost containment. Reentry programs—those that facilitate the social integration of released inmates—have produced inconsistent results. Although trauma-informed-care has become commonplace across social and justice services, surprisingly few male-centered reentry programs focus their service efforts on the resolution of trauma and the reduction of traumatic symptomology.  However, research consistently indicates that a comparatively high rate of male offenders endures trauma exposure throughout their life, and that trauma-related symptoms may contribute to offending behaviors. Therefore, a community-university collaborative team in Milwaukee, Wisconsin is in the planning stages of implementing a trauma resolution model within a male-only reentry-like program. The research question to be answered is the following: Is participation in a trauma-resolution treatment model associated with improvements in mental health outcomes over time among reentry program participants? Through a quasi-experimental design, 30 qualified men will participate in “Instinctive Trauma Response” (ITR) treatment. The comparison group will be composed of 30 matched participants. Mental health outcomes including PTSD will be measured at baseline and four additional time points to assess potential program effects immediately after the intervention and up to 12 weeks beyond. With a mixed effects analysis of covariance, controlling for several demographic variables and using a repeated measures assessment design, the investigators will assess changes over time across both study conditions. Study authors hypothesize that ITR will reduce symptoms of trauma and improve mental health for intervention participants. The implication is that positive results could help influence reentry programming, potentially prompting the integration of trauma-resolution models within reentry programming.

Synchronous Presentation April 16th at 2:45pm

Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer or mobile app

Click here to join the meeting

Or call in (audio only)
+1 414-253-8850,,732884111#   United States, Milwaukee

Phone Conference ID: 732 884 111#

Comments

  1. Incredibly important work here, Michael. Proactively understanding trauma from the perspective of resolution could serve as a fundamental paradigm for streamlining reentry and inhibiting rearrests. Great job!

    1. Thank you for your comment! I agree with the many researchers who share this perspective, yet we (as a society) have often provided interventions that align more with punishment than assistance; influencing abuse and trauma instead of healing.

  2. I tend to believe that trauma and maladaptive trauma symptomology is much more prevalent than we often believe. After all, the underlying commonality is “how we experience and adapt” to phenomena, not simply that we “have experienced” specific phenomena. Please share a comment or question about trauma, healing, and/or the Department of Corrections!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *