Kenya Elections 2022: Mzee Kenyatta’s Curse Continues to Dog Kenya

Mzee Kenyatta vs. Jaramogi Odinga

In his fight with Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Mzee Kenyatta resorted to demanding an oath of allegiance that the “Flag of Kenya Shall Not Leave the House of Mumbi”. Mumbi is the mythical ancestor of the Kikuyu clans. Mzee Kenyatta went further than that in his reference to the Luo people as “kihii”—a term that is equivalent to “juvenile”, applied to an uncircumcised youth. Traditionally while the Kikuyu’s rites of passage required circumcision, Luo practiced the procedure of knocking six lower front teeth to mark the transition to adulthood. The Luo people stopped this practice years ago. In fact a disproportionate number of Kenyan doctors today is made up of Luo physicians and they know better than anyone the African cultural “idiocy” of many of these practices, including “female circumcision” that many African tribes of Kenya practice.

Mzee Kenyatta used the brilliant Luo son of the soil Tom Mboya to marginalize and eliminate what he considered as the “menace” of Jaramogi Odinga in Kenyan politics. He succeeded in doing that. After that, many expected Tom Mboya to assume the mantle of leadership after Mzee Kenyatta’s reign. But Tom Mboya was shot to death in broad daylight on a busy street in Nairobi.

In the course of time, Mzee Kenyatta formed a strong alliance with Daniel arap Moi who had the allegiance of the huge voting block of the Kalenjin in the Rift Valley.

After Kenyatta’s demise, Moi took over and promised to follow the footsteps of Mzee Kenyatta. He coined the term of “Nyayo” to legitimize his trajectory to power. Moi was ruthless. He left the suppression of dissidents to henchmen like Amos Biwott, the most feared man in Kenya for many years. During the reign of Moi, another prominent Luo leader, Robert Ouko, the Foreign Minister in Moi’s government, was brutally murdered in a most gruesome manner.

Kenya became a “one party” repressive state until the advent of multi-parties born out of the struggle by prominent Kenyans across the tribal divide. The current era of multi-parties has seen the recreation of the voting block of “Mount” Kenya tribes and Kalenjin tribes—a two tribes political formation that simply co-opted the support of other major tribes, particularly the Luhya and Kamba. The long time nemesis of the “two headed political monster” in Kenya has always been the Luo! That was so during Mzee Kenyatta’s time and remains so, today after what we have seen in this election: 2022.

Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga and the Handshake

To the credit of these two “political youngsters”, they tried to break the “curse” laid by Uhuru’s father by bridging the political divide through a symbolic gesture of a handshake that became known as the “Bridging of the Bridges Initiative”.

The “Bridging of the Bridges Initiative” was never received well by Kikuyu and Kalenjin leaders and king makers. It threatened to rupture the “two-tribe hegemony” of the Kikuyu (Mt. Kenya) and the Kalenjin.

The Kenya General Elections of 2022 was a critical test of whether the country would move beyond the “traditional fault line” of a “two horse monopoly” of power represented by Ruto, one side, and the group that represented the new era of politics in Kenya: Raila Odinga and Martha Karua. The naming of William Ruto as the winner means that Kenya has sunk once again into the putrid politics of the past. There are many people in the Kikuyu/Mount Kenya communities who defied their “own” Uhuru Kenyatta and voted for Ruto. Even in Kiambu, the domicile of Kikuyu “royalty” saw the abandonment of Uhuru Kenyatta and support for William Ruto.

It is pointless to litigate the process of vote tallying, because the elephant in the room is the “primitive” political process that is used by ruthless leaders to capture state power and protecting the corrupt and looting government coffers.

Uhuru and Raila Decide to Work Together!

It is said that politics often leads to strange bed fellows, and so let it be with what the Kenyan public saw today, March 9, 2018: Uhuru and Raila coming together to announce their decision to work together. If Raila and Uhuru were divided by truly ideological fault lines of “left and right”, their decision would be dubbed by people on the left as “class collaboration”! But we have none of this type of situation in Kenya. All what the “wananchi” (citizens) want are jobs that pay a living wage, decent housing and healthcare, clean and safe drinking water, affordable education for their children, etc. This is the tall billing that the different political parties have to deliver. To do that they have to collect revenues from different sources and allocate money efficiently and fairly in all parts of Kenya. The government has to control wayward expenditures such as the salaries and fringe benefits of members of parliament and civil servants,  and deal with corruption, etc. This was not evident even when Raila was the in the government.

Despite party differences, the needs of the people are the same throughout Kenya. The modalities through which such needs can be satisfied does not differ much across the different political party platforms. So why do we have different political parties? The answer is: because we have different tribes and political constituencies that are largely tribal! To avoid the “zero sum” politics of the gain for this tribe is a loss for another tribe, the coming together of Uhuru and Raila is actually a matter of objective necessity that is determined by the nature of hopelessly tribal politics!

Jaramogi Oginga Odinga: A Man Who Paid a Heavy Price for His Exalted Beliefs!

If you don’t believe in exalted principles that go beyond “tribalism” and “realpolitik” you cannot understand why Jaramogi Oginga Odinga orchestrated the freedom of Kenyatta and the chant of “no uhuru without Kenyatta”. That was a high point in Kenyan political history. It was the culmination of the long protracted nationalist struggle that began with Kenyatta in the 1930s and formation of the first “crypto-nationalist” movement of the “Kikuyu Central Association” and publication of the paper “Mwigwithania”.  Kenyatta later  left for England where he joined forces with the larger “anti-colonial” movement with such prominent leaders like George Padmore (West Indies), Kwame Nkumah (Gold Coast), Nehru (India), Sukarno (Indonesia). This was a world-wide anti-colinial movement. When Kenyatta came back to Kenya shortly after WWII, he joined forces with other nationalist leaders under the banner of Kenya African Union (KAU). Prominent among these were Achieng’ Oneko, Kungu Karumba, Paul Ngei and Fred Kubai. All of them including Kenyatta were sent to prison in Kapenguria!

It is this legacy that Jaramogi Oginga Odinga inherited with the Kenya African National Union (KANU), on the eve of Kenya’s independence. Many in the colonial administration in Kenya and the UK did not want Kenyatta to become the president since he had been billed as the leader of MAU MAU. That was thought to be a “risk” for British interests in Kenya. In fact the last outgoing British governor in the Kenya Colony and Protectorate described Kenyatta as a “leader of darkness and death”. By the same token, the nationalist movement in Kenya led by Jaramogi, regarded Kenyatta as pivotal in terms of a radical departure with politics of acquiescence and an accommodation. The British had their own line-up of leaders who they had groomed to take over. The latter included Tom Mboya, a darling of both the British and the Americans.

Unfortunately all these developments were upstaged by the larger global alignments generated by the post-World War II fever of the “Cold War”. This split the nationalist alignments in Kenya along the same lines: the “left” (Jaramogi Oginga Odinga), and the “right” (Tom Mboya). The labor movement in Kenya was also split between the Trade Union Congress (left) and the Kenya Federation of Labor (right). Kenyan labor movements were further aligned with the larger global labor movements of Word Trade Union Congress–left, (with TCU as an affiliate through the Ghanain body of the same name), and the International Confederation of Free Trade Union, “right” (with Mboya’s KFL as an affiliate).

To say that Jaramogi Oginga Odinga had himself to blame for not being the president of Kenya and chose instead to orchestrate the presidency of Kenyatta, is a profession of the lack of understanding of the exalted principles that motivated his actions. That also explains why we are still stuck in the mud in the quagmire of “tribalized politics” in Kenya! Ironically, it is the very same dungeons of “tribalized politics” whose contradictions will usher in a new era in Kenyan politics. We have here an illustration of the dialectical process of development at work!

The Internet and US Conglomerates: Contradictions of Our Times

The internet was initially conceived and developed by the US Army and the Department of Defense for their own use in the American quest for “control and management” of the world. This was in large measure driven by the Cold War fever deriving from the John Foster Dulles doctrine of “containment of communism”. Well, today the internet is a global phenomenon that serves both global conglomerates as well as millions of small businesses and people like you or me. It has also opened a democratic space of open source computing where lots of good things are available to many of us without paying a dime.

However, as is usually the case in capitalist development, small outfits and individuals have also leveraged the power of the internet to develop into “conglomerates”. This is the story of Bill Gates and Microsoft and the guys at Google. It is an immutable law of capitalist growth and development that due to the constant drive towards making maximum profits, capitalist enterprises will invariably resort to mergers, anti-unionism, tax evasions, political payoffs and corruption, and outright criminal activities including kidnapping and murders.

The Other Side of the Internet: Teachers, Activists and People of Goodwill

Counter-poised to the quest for “maximum profits” is the philosophy that drives many teachers, activists and countless others whose exalted vision of humanity goes well beyond the imperatives of the profit making calculus of the capitalist system and giant corporate monopolies. Let us keep alive this spirit of serving humanity by doing whatever we can to help others in need or distress. This was supposed to be my Sunday sermon for yesterday (April 23, 2017), but I got sidetracked by my exuberance of hearing from a Kenya lady I assisted with statistical modeling using “free” resources from the internet, thanks to the “democratic space” provided by the institutions of higher learning such as the University of California, Los Angeles.