Tools: Citation Management Software

Learn how to use citation management software. Do so when you are writing a class paper or as you are writing your dissertation proposal. These are programs such as EndNote, RefMan, Zotero, and others that are specialized databases that serve to organize your digital library and also work together with writing programs (e.g. MS Word) to format your references to fit a particular journal’s requirements. Pick one used by your advisor, fellow students, or the one supported by your university. Some cost money and some are free. They are web-enabled and allow collaborative use. I have had great luck with the program called Zotero. (They are non-profit and do not know that I am mentioning their product here). See if your university library offers a course to get you started.

Allow yourself a big smile the first time you are searching in google scholar or pubmed and with one click bring both the citation and pdf into your own digital library.

Sigh gently when you digitally insert the correct citation into your excellent prose.

Laugh out loud when your entire bibliography is built with one click.

(Bang your head against the wall when you realize that your collaborative grant document has been corrupted because of competes between track changes and your citation management software. But then realize that fixing it still saves time because inserting hundreds of citations and correctly formatting the bibliography just isn’t how you want to spend your weekend). 

Time Management

You may not have noticed (ha!), but graduate school places a lot of competing demands on your time. The bad news is that the more you progress, and the better you do, the more you will be asked to do. But the good news is that you are largely in charge of what opportunities you pursue, and over what time frame.

Consider these time management philosophies:

First decide how much you will work. If you don’t protect your time off, you won’t have any, and you have to do this first. You deserve time off. (You require time off.)

Honor and plan your commitments to yourself just like would a colleague. Mark on your calendar when you will work on something and then follow through. This includes saying no to competing appointments that may present. Build trust with yourself by your consistency in this.

Also make appointments for time off, and honor these appointments.

Be very clear on items that require your 100% versus those that will truly be OK with your 80%. A dissertation idea requires all you’ve got. Studying for a test might not. It’s OK not to give 100% to all items at all times.

Know when to say no, and do so.

Beware email. Responding to email all day may not be furthering your work, or the work you really need to focus on. Consider email management strategies, which might include having a set time every day for email response, always emptying your inbox, only ever opening an email once and then acting (rather than coming back to it multiple times), and others. A few hours spent researching email management might have big pay-offs.

Notice, and manage, emotion that might be in reality taking up a lot of time. Are you stressing that you don’t know how to proceed? Do you think you aren’t up to the task? Are you irritated at colleagues or manuscript reviewers? Are you bored? Is there a personal matter that you really need to take care of? The goal is not to prevent the emotion from cropping up, but in recognizing and dealing with it pro-actively rather than letting it constantly storm across your fabulous mind, preventing it from focusing on the work at hand.

Work with your inherent mental reward system by finishing work. Every finish will itself give you a little mental hit. Wrapping something up can be really difficult. So notice your finish. And then do it again, and again, and again.

With gratitude to D.S.

Information Curation

OK, kids, we really are living in the age of information, and this is an absolutely fabulous thing for science! Virtually at your fingertips are datasets, publications, informed opinion-pieces, reams of information collected by smart devices, videos of experts sharing their wisdom, and more. It’s a smorgasbord of inputs that can really give a leg-up to your contribution to making the world a better place, and you must avail yourself of this wealth to some degree.

But you have to be careful not to drown. There is so much, so accessible. Attempting to keep up with it all can be overwhelming, and in the end, non-productive. You’ve got to surf on top of the information, dipping in when purposeful. It is absolutely essential that you have an active plan to curate the information onslaught.

Make use of technical tools. Be attuned to automated literature searches, effective use of social media, and improving your literature searching skills. This is a changing world and you are ready to participate. Determine your own style, to include whether you prefer to go to the information, or have information come to you. Be real about whether you are keeping up, or piling up (for later perusal), and alter your methods until they are truly working.

Seek people to help. Your advisor may recommend an advocacy organization that puts out helpful content or a media aggregator to skim. A colleague may share information on pre-publication repositories. But don’t forget the people who are trained to navigate this world – librarians. Indeed, there are individuals who have spent years knowing how to find and sift information and they likely will provide individualized consultation to you, free of charge. And remember that you don’t have to know it all, yourself. You are participating in a community of science where the knowledge is held in aggregate.

Participate in the age of information, by aligning and curating the stream that you swim in, until it maximizes your ability to make the world a better place.

The Lift

You might have visions of being that scientist that goes down in the history books – the one with the spectacular insight that changes the world. Don’t let go of that drive. It will give you the courage to go big, to innovate, in ways that bring you joy and make the world a better place.

But know that most of your time will be spent building upon the work of others. Science progresses by a slow collective push of incremental knowledge, building upwards. Don’t despair that each drop is small. Settle into becoming part of the river. Learn what has come before, by reading in your focused area and also in the foundational and tangential areas that influence your niche. Practice the art of finding the next incremental step where your skills and the practicalities of a research question can fill in a gap to provide a platform for the next work. Get your work out there rather than letting it sit inside your mind or in a dusty drawer, by publishing it, so that others can build upon your excellent progress. Look for the people and agencies who are putting up the sign-posts of what might come next to make the world a better place. They might be writing strategic plans or offering funding: great ideas for your consideration.

Look for all of the ways that others are lifting you up to create the next step, and be the lift for others.

Ease

I love the word “ease”. Let’s call it “easy without the judgement”. Let this word conjure up going with the flow, leaning into the support of the universe, and an inner state of calm that allows for productivity and excellence without the buckle down, the grit, or the fight. Consider that ease might be possible, as a doctoral student, and beyond. How, you say? Start by paying attention to your habits. Notice your body’s knowledge of when stress is around the corner, and consider pausing there, or altering your course. Develop a warning bell for when you begin to resist, and then gently consider the reason. Minimize drama, whether inside or outside yourself. Consider that the benefits of allowing ease might, in the end, help you to make the world a better place. I would love to have you join me on my own journey to cultivate ease in the world of academia. (Gasp!).

Yes and No

Whoa is it important to know how and when to say “yes” versus saying “no” to a scientific opportunity.

Saying “no” is not only OK, but is a requirement of being a successful academic. (The better you do, the more you will be asked to do, and I am quite certain that your body, if not your mind, requires care and feeding). Saying “no” appropriately and professionally benefits from practice. It’s not too early to practice while a graduate student.

Once you’ve said “yes”, you are committed. So slow down there kids before you say “yes” or “no”!

Say “yes” if you have the enthusiasm, time, and skills to follow through on your promise. Backing out or failing to deliver are bummers, for you and the other. Look at your calendar and see if you can schedule the work this week or the next. If it’s looking difficult, be honest about whether your schedule truly opens up after that, and whether this timing fits the project need. Say “yes” if the work fits into your on-going interests and areas of expertise, helps you with a new skill set you have been meaning to work on, or assists toward your graduation requirements, dissertation project, post-graduation position, a publication or grant, or other goals you have. Say “yes” if you enjoy working with this person/people and enjoy this type of activity.

Beware the “hallway ask”, when someone asks you verbally for assistance during an unscheduled encounter. Ask for additional information to be sent to you by email, if appropriate. This allows you the time to consider more carefully. In my experience the asker may not always follow up with this, indicating that their ask was not robust to the passage of time, but was more of a whim in the moment.

There are times when a “no” is not appropriate, such as if the ask is really a part of your paid position, or obligation to graduate, or is written into a funded grant. Other times you must consider how the ask fits into the academic hierarchy, and that that there may be relationship cost to saying “no”, and this must be weighed in.

Seek input from your advisor.

If you do say “no”, do so as promptly as you can, so that the asker can move on. An email is usually appropriate. Start with a thank-you for the opportunity. A lengthy explanation of your decline is not needed. If you have anything helpful to share, such as a pertinent publication or suggestion of someone else to help, certainly share this freely.

Manage your time and your reputation by practicing the art of under-promising and over-delivering. People do science. People make science fun. So love the peoples! (And love yourself).

Write. In First Person

Traditional scientific writing uses passive voice. Passive voice persists because it sounds objective and scientific, and because change can be threatening. “The cells were treated with . . . .”; “The subjects were followed until December 31 . . . .”. It’s stuffy, and at times difficult to read, and it purposefully distances the reader from the people who did the work.

It’s time to break the fourth wall of science. Be bold. Write in a way that is direct, clear, and transparent, acknowledging that people do science. Write in first person.
It may feel awkward at first, especially if you have been taught to write in passive voice. You might risk butting up a bit against your instructors’ direction. (And of course if this is the case, it is up to you whether to follow directions for a grade, or to take the opportunity to practice strong first-person writing). Luckily, you are living in a time when journals and grant reviewers are largely accepting of first-person writing.

You must first notice if and when you are writing in passive voice. And then flip the sentences around. It’s easy. Say what you did. You may have worked alone, and then your sentences will start with “I”. More often you will be working with others. “We enrolled . . . .”, “We performed a logistic regression . . . .”. “We measured . . . .”. Aim for direct, action-oriented writing that breathes clarity into your publications and the world.

Benefits of the Obvious Path

Decisions can be fraught. There is a pressure to pick the best research project – the option that is most inspiring, with the most potential – the one that perfectly fits your burning interest. I encourage you, in making this choice, to consider the flow of the universe around you. At any given time there is a research question that will be supported by circumstances. This could take the form of kind, talented collaborators who are enthusiastic and able, financial resources within easier reach, a dataset that is a ready match for the question, or an approach that aligns solidly with your strengths. Consider this path. Consider it even if it means setting aside your pet question for a time. There is so much research to be done to make the world a better place. By selecting a supported path, the work will get done with more ease. Call it grasping the low-hanging fruit or call it being practical, but completed work has impact, unlike the shiny idea inside your mind that hasn’t come to fruition yet. Ultimately you need both the inspiration and the finished projects. Maximize your contribution by not being too proud to accept support and take a simpler path to get something done.

Tools: Your CV

As soon as you are a doctoral student, it is time to develop your CV or curriculum vitae. A CV is basically a long ugly resume that is specific to academic accomplishments.

Do work on your CV now, because it will be used during introductions for informational interviews, for scholarship applications, and more.

Do NOT wait until the moment you need a CV to craft one. It is best to have it developed and polished well ahead of time.

Do NOT add a few bullets to an old resume. Start fresh for this new type of document.

Do follow a model (or blend models) of others’ CVs that you like, finding them online or by asking your advisor.

Do have some aspects of your CV that are specific to your stage as a student. This could include a short section on courses completed. (Make sure to give course titles as course numbers are meaningless on their own). This could include a section on class paper topics. After you have some publications to report, you will consider dropping this section.

Do include information from your life before graduate school, but be selective. This is not a place where people will look for continuity and gaps. Only provide information on previous employment or internship-type activities if it helps showcase your skills and professionalism (e.g. a foreign language or managerial or technical experience).

Do NOT include information for the purpose of showing that you are well-rounded, such as clubs, sports, or religious activities.

Do include undergraduate academic accomplishments, such as academic awards, scholarships, or publications.

Do include manuscripts that are submitted to a journal in a section called “Under Review” or similar.

Do NOT include manuscripts at any stage prior to being submitted, (e.g. “in preparation”). This state of work is too speculative and is a flag for a padded CV.

Do NOT worry too much about having a perfectly-formatted page, because this document is designed to grow and grow as you do.

Do, however, make sure to use clean fonts and indents for clear organization and easy reading.

Absolutely ask your advisor + others to critique your CV. There may be an office at your university that can also help, but make sure they know you are developing a CV, not a resume.

Do save your CV with a date, and continue to update it as you grow your academic fabulousness.

Geeks R Us

OK, kids, you may have noticed that academics are a select group. Like you, they are more likely than others to be smart and interested in ideas. You all may be working toward similar goals. These commonalities can support you. Let this reality give you the ease and confidence to be yourself. Let your enthusiasm shine. You might be the one with the social skills to initiate the connections and the fun, even if you have not played this role in the past.